Tag Archive: protest
Photographers, city council members sue NYC for systematic violations of civil rights during Occupy Wall StreetOct 23, 2012 by M. Scott Brauer 1 Comment »
“The claims arise from a series of incidents in connection with Occupy Wall Street protests beginning in and around September 17, 2011 and continuing to the present day in which the City of New York in concert with various private and public entities have employed Officers of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) and others acting under color of state law, to intentionally and willfully subject Plaintiffs and the public to, among other things, violations of rights to free speech, assembly, freedom of the press, false arrest, excessive force, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution and, furthermore, purposefully obstructing Plaintiffs carrying out their duties as elected officials and members of the press, including oversight of the New York City Police Department.” -Rodriguez Et Al v. Winski Et Al. First Amended Complaint (pdf, scribd link)
We’ve written before about photographers being abused while covering protests in New York City. Now, photographers Stephanie Keith, Charles Meacham, the National Press Photographers’ Association (see their blog about the case), five NYC city council members, and others, have joined in a federal lawsuit against various New York City entities and officials, including Mayor Bloomberg, the Metropolitan Transit Authority, and a number of identified and unidentified police officers, as well as JP Morgan Chase and other businesses in the Occupy Wall Street area, alleging that they engaged in the intentional obstruction of news-gathering activities, the business of elected officials, and Constitutionally-protected protest activities. The complaint can be read in it’s entirety here. In an NPPA press release about the lawsuit, a quotation summarizes photographer Stephanie Keith’s complaints against the city and others, “I joined this lawsuit because as a working journalist I’ve been arrested, thrown to the ground, hit with batons and yelled at by the NYPD while doing my job on assignment. I have seen my fellow journalists being treated this way as well. Why should journalists be subjected to trauma inducing harassment on the job?”
University of Georgia student newspaper staff walks out after pressure to take grip-and-grin photos and focus on ‘good’ news rather than journalismAug 16, 2012 by M. Scott Brauer No Comments »
- Content that is ABOUT our audience doing something unique, helpful, outstanding, new,
dramatic, ie scholarships for freshman.
- Content that our readers have asked for, ie. how to save money, how to join a club, where to
tind a job, what’s going on (events), what’s new. We have a list to start. Build the list by talking
to our audience.
- Content that catches people or organizations doing bad things. I guess this is ‘journalism’…
If in question, have more GOOD than BAD.” -Expectations of Editorial Director at The Red and Black, 8/15/12
Both Matt and I got our starts in student journalism, together at the official student newspaper at our university, and me at an unofficial student newspaper. One of the most tenuous holds of freedom of the press and speech in the US is in the classrooms of student newspapers, stemming from the landmark court case Hazelwood School District et al. v. Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988). Today, students in the editorial staff at the University of Georgia who run the independent newspaper the Red and Black have walked out after new regulations (may require login to your google account) were imposed on the paper by the paper’s editorial board. At issue, the new regulations require more good news than bad, where bad means “content that catches people or organizations doing bad things” and refers to this sarcastically as “journalism” in scare quotes; require that the paper not print large photos or photos that don’t clearly show the subject; focus on attracting submitted content from readers; and print grip-and-grin photos of the paper’s audience. While the editorial board says these regulations are just a draft, now-former Editor-in-Chief Polina Marinova said in her public resignation letter, that all content to be published by the Red and Black would be reviewed by a non-student Editorial Director prior to publication online or in print. Former student newspaper staff have created their own online publication in the wake of their walkout, Red and Dead.Poynter has more coverage, as does the Student Press Law Center. The Red and Black has released a statement in response to the student staff walkouts.
The whole situation reads like a microcosm of what’s been happening at newspapers across the country as staffs are gutted and institutional knowledge is lost in favor of cheap and quick content.
“Just after 11am on Sunday, four people in sunglasses entered the gallery where the exhibition was being held. One took a hammer from his sock and threatened security staff. A guard restrained one man but the remaining members of the group managed to smash an acrylic screen and slash the photograph with what police believe was a screwdriver or ice pick. They then destroyed another photograph, of nuns’ hands in prayer.” -Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ destroyed by Christian protesters, The Guardian, 18 April 2011
Piss Christ, the long-controversial photograph by Andres Serrano depicting a crucifix submerged in urine, has been attacked once again by Christian protestors. The work was on display in Avignon, France, in an exhibition celebrating the collection of art dealer Yvon Lambert. This is not the first time the work has been protested or attacked; the work was at the forefront of an effort led by US Senator Jesse Helms to end government funding of the US’ National Endowment for the Arts, and in 1997 teenagers used a hammer to destroy a copy of the photo at the National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne, Australia.
(via APhotoStudent on facebook)
I had some shit happen yesterday, originally I had no desire to let anyone know. But after watching the news, realizing I was one of many, and that I was very lucky, I’ve decided I’ll write a small account of what happened: 1) Because it adds an account to what is occuring here, simply put it’s news. 2) I’m holed up the hotel right now, as of right now (9AM) I dont know a single journalist heading out on the ground today. -Andrew Burton, Feb. 3, 2011
Andrew Burton has been covering the unfolding news in Egypt. Yesterday he was attacked while doing so in Cairo, and he’s written a harrowing account of what it’s like to be attacked by a mob. Thankfully, he was rescued. You can see some of Burton’s photos from the day of the attack on his blog.
Ron Haviv (didn’t know he had a personal site, by the way, in addition to what’s on the VII website) has also been covering protests in Egypt, and told MSNBC’s PHOTOblog about the dangers and difficulties of getting close to protesters (video below):
Some of Haviv’s pictures are available on VII’s website.
Quite a few friends of dvafoto are on the ground in Egypt, and we wish them safety and good journalism.
The usual accusation made against the media in these scenarios is that they treat the violent minority as representative . In this case it is literally true, in the sense that this photo of one over-excited protestor is used to portray the whole event. But in fact the narratives are more nuanced. -Charlie Beckett
Charlie Beckett offers thoughtful analysis of how the newsmedia uses imagery to flesh out narratives by looking at recent coverage of the student protests in London. A number of newspapers used the same image as their cover, as seen in the image above from Political Scrapbook. Worth a read and a look.
(via Photography Prison)
As is being widely reported today, a credentialed journalist threw two shoes at outgoing US president George W. Bush during a press conference in Iraq yesterday. BagNewsNotes has the usual interesting analysis, with a nod toward previous shoes hurled at politicians in Iraq. The New York Times has another video of the incident from an angle different from the animated gif above. As one commenter on metafilter notes, Bush’s reaction is that of a man who has clearly had things thrown at him before.
The symbolism of shoes being thrown may be lost on western viewers, though the meaning is being widely reported. The above video, from Iraq in 2003, shows a man defiling a banner of Saddam Hussein with his shoes. I remember photos and video of kids attacking the fallen statue of Hussein in Baghdad in 2003, also, but can’t find those images. Getty has a typical picture of men attacking a statue with their shoes.
I’m particularly struck by the photo chosen by the New York Times to lead their coverage. The photo by Saul Loeb of the AFP, shows Bush, blurry and indistinct, while Iraqi prime minister Nuri al-Maliki remains standing with arms outstretched. Here we have an Iraqi, standing tall and staying the course, protecting the American.