<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stepan Rudik disqualified from World Press Photo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/</link>
	<description>Matt Lutton and M. Scott Brauer share their work and others&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Welty</title>
		<link>http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-31114</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Welty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvafoto.com/?p=3720#comment-31114</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m floored by the transformation - it took some serious vision to even have the idea, as the result looks nothing like the dull photo Rudik started with. This is only going to give people new temptation to go fish for a strong image where there first was none.

So is the missing foot really the only issue for the photojournalism community? Maybe that is the only criteria that can really stand its ground, since that is the only post-processing that can&#039;t be achieved by other means, through either optics or chemistry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m floored by the transformation &#8211; it took some serious vision to even have the idea, as the result looks nothing like the dull photo Rudik started with. This is only going to give people new temptation to go fish for a strong image where there first was none.</p>
<p>So is the missing foot really the only issue for the photojournalism community? Maybe that is the only criteria that can really stand its ground, since that is the only post-processing that can&#8217;t be achieved by other means, through either optics or chemistry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett Lion &#124; Why digging up dead bodies and photographing them is a bad idea</title>
		<link>http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-30662</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett Lion &#124; Why digging up dead bodies and photographing them is a bad idea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvafoto.com/?p=3720#comment-30662</guid>
		<description>[...] kudos to Benjamin for bringing all of this to light. Second, I&#8217;m glad to see photographers and others who have opinions on something other than photoshop manipulation, which has always seemed beside the point to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kudos to Benjamin for bringing all of this to light. Second, I&#8217;m glad to see photographers and others who have opinions on something other than photoshop manipulation, which has always seemed beside the point to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Descalificado por Modificar, &#8220;World Press Photo&#8221; &#171; ivasfot0910</title>
		<link>http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-27034</link>
		<dc:creator>Descalificado por Modificar, &#8220;World Press Photo&#8221; &#171; ivasfot0910</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvafoto.com/?p=3720#comment-27034</guid>
		<description>[...] Mas fotografías he información aquí; http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mas fotografías he información aquí; <a href="http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World Press Photo, Stepan Rudik&#8217;in fotoğrafını diskalifiye etti</title>
		<link>http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-26943</link>
		<dc:creator>World Press Photo, Stepan Rudik&#8217;in fotoğrafını diskalifiye etti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvafoto.com/?p=3720#comment-26943</guid>
		<description>[...] Diskalifiye fotoğraflarının kaynağı&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Diskalifiye fotoğraflarının kaynağı&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hernan Zenteno</title>
		<link>http://www.dvafoto.com/2010/03/stepan-rudik-disqualified-from-world-press-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-26779</link>
		<dc:creator>Hernan Zenteno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvafoto.com/?p=3720#comment-26779</guid>
		<description>He made a photoshop photo from a first photo. These days there are a lot of this retouching and one can see that practice without erase parts but with the same PS techniques in others essays that won. But i see some hypocrisy from the WPP people. Because how much photojournalist value have a serie of a man showing his ass in differents locations? Or a price from the past year, toy soldiers in a set. Are this more credible and more journalist this other prices because they only stage the photos of a situations that only exist in the imaginations of the photographers. I don&#039;t understand this tendency of the last years of WPP. They give prices to people that made very journalistic work but at the same time they give prices to other work that at less for my knowledge is not photojournalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He made a photoshop photo from a first photo. These days there are a lot of this retouching and one can see that practice without erase parts but with the same PS techniques in others essays that won. But i see some hypocrisy from the WPP people. Because how much photojournalist value have a serie of a man showing his ass in differents locations? Or a price from the past year, toy soldiers in a set. Are this more credible and more journalist this other prices because they only stage the photos of a situations that only exist in the imaginations of the photographers. I don&#8217;t understand this tendency of the last years of WPP. They give prices to people that made very journalistic work but at the same time they give prices to other work that at less for my knowledge is not photojournalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
